skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(290)
-
▼
August
(28)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (12/5/85)
- Garfield: Lost in Trnaslation (8/29/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/28/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/27/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/26/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/25/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/24/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/22/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (9/1/06)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/19/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/18/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/17/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/16/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/15/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/14/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/13/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/12/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/11/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/10/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/9/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/8/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/7/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (12/3/06)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/5/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/4/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/3/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/2/09)
- Garfield: Lost in Translation (8/1/09)
-
▼
August
(28)
Posts
Usually you can still sort-of piece these together, but... ham?
ReplyDeleteLol.
I was so such that I must've made a typo or something that I did this multiple times. I even singularly put the word "hum" into google translator and it would always return "ham!"
ReplyDelete